Ep. 31: The Simple Truth About Common Law and using it to Debunk the Alleged Pandemic

Ep. 31: The Simple Truth About Common Law and using it to Debunk the Alleged Pandemic

In this episode my guest Nick St Clare busts the myth often peddled that that common law is weak, powerless and had ‘no teeth’. IT IS in fact, the principle according to which precedent is created everyday in the UK courts.

The Common Law CAN and DOES overturn *any* legislation. In this interview Nick discusses lawful excuse and how to exercise our rights to lawful excuse against anything unlawful – namely something that is using unreasonable, excessive force in the face of a non-emergency situation, i.e. The Coronavirus Act, passed 3 days *after* Coronavirus was *downgraded* from a HCID. And considering that the increase in deaths in the UK from 2019-2020 was a just 0.14% we have unreasonable and excessive force being used against us to strip us of all our inherent rights and liberties. This gives us lawful excuse to rise up and overturn the legislation in our numbers.

Common Law is:

– Powerful enough to change people’s minds in a positive direction

– Simple enough for a child to understand

– Effective enough to change the world

Nick St Clare is a leading UK Common Law Activist and Teacher of the Common Law with over 40 years of active voluntary service to his credit. His site has an enormous amount of resources and facts that you can use, right now, to help eradicate the effects of this alleged pandemic upon us. Visit https://reclaimthelaw.org (please also make a donation to this site as Nick is giving away all he does for free). Watch the interview here on Youtube:

Nick’s website https://reclaimthelaw.org is already censored on Facebook – Nick must be a VERY powerful man indeed!

You can also watch the video on Bitchute just in case this one gets taken down (and please do subscribe to my Bitchute channel. I will begin to populate it with all the AWNA episodes (that’s Awakening Nation)

Hancock, Whitty, Vallance & Ferguson Stand Accused of Pandemic Fraud

Hancock, Whitty, Vallance & Ferguson Stand Accused of Pandemic Fraud

After yet more damning evidence arose last week, further additions had to be made to the court papers, which we are now aiming to lay in the coming week. The four defendants will be Matt Hancock, Chris Whitty, Patrick Vallance and Neil Ferguson, each of whom has inextricable and ultimately incriminating connections with Bill Gates and Big Pharma.

As well as three counts of fraud by false representation and seven counts of fraud by non-disclosure, under sections 2 and 3 of the Fraud Act 2006, we can now also prove that the entire worldwide scamdemic originated on these shores.

In fact, we can show that, without the dishonest statements and non-disclosures of the four defendants we are initially proceeding against, COVID-1984 would not have transpired.

 

Fraud Unravels All, Including Parliamentary Privilege

Furthermore, the 1st defendant, Matt Hancock, cannot rely upon the defence of Parliamentary Privilege, on the ground that none of the evidence relied upon by the prosecution is capable of preventing parliamentarians from carrying out their lawful business in Parliament.

The motive for conspiring to commit the heinous crimes alleged was paradoxically simple, despite the complexity of the deceptions perpetrated – the maximisation of ‘vaccination’ uptake, as per the UN’s Sustainable Development Goal of ‘immunising’ the entire world population.

 

Jury Analogy

Just imagine, if you will, a man charged with poisoning people to death with lethal pharmaceuticals being tried before a jury rigged with people who have direct links to the companies who researched, developed, manufactured and distributed the poisons which killed the alleged victims.

The prosecution barrister would no doubt successfully apply for a mistrial, on the ground that the jurors were prejudiced by blatant conflicts of interest, which would more than hamper the delivery of a just decision, upon the evidence.

Now transpose those circumstances to COVID-1984, change the defendant to ‘vaccine’ and change the jury for the secretary of state for the DHSC, the chief medical officer, the chief scientific officer and the WHO’s senior advisor on ‘pandemic’ identification and response, and you will begin to comprehend how Big Pharma hijacked government policy, for the sole purpose of maximising ‘vaccination’ uptake, whatever the cost.

 

Accessories To Criminal Fraud

Furthermore, evidence has also arisen which demonstrates that Facebook and Google met with the UK Government and agreed to censor any content which exposes this nefarious agenda.  Which naturally means the individuals concerned….

 

Click here to continue reading